Fighting relegation in Scottish football - to arbitration we must go! (Hearts & Partick Thistle v SPFL)
This article considers the decision (available here) of Lord Clark, who presided over the recent procedural hearing, relating to whether the Court of Session was the appropriate forum for the dispute between Heart of Midlothian Football Club & Partick Thistle v The Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL) or whether the proceedings should be suspended and instead heard by an arbitral tribunal (as SPFL contend).
The dispute itself relates to the claimants’ relegation from their respective divisions within the SPFL as a consequence of the early curtailment of the season for COVID-19.
Specifically, the article examines:
- Legal proceedings
- Was there a valid arbitration agreement?
- Does the dispute fall within arbitration provisions?
- Arguments against arbitration by the claimants:
- Unfair prejudice
- Barred as steps have been taken in the court proceedings
- Arbitration agreement incapable of being performed
- Public interest
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Arbitration | Covid-19 | Dispute Resolution | Football | Scotland | Scottish Championship | Scottish Football Association | Scottish Premiership | Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL)
- A review of the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal’s first COVID-19 decision (Surmacz v. BM SLAM Stal)
- Return to play for US college sports - legal risks, liability waivers and best practices
- Sport and intellectual property – the year in review 2019/20
- Sport and competition law – the year in review 2019/20
About the Author
Gavin is a Partner, Digby Brown, one of Scotland's largest specialist litigation firms. He undertook a commercial traineeship at Dentons in Glasgow and Edinburgh before moving to his current firm where he specialises in reparation litigation.