The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal’s policy on publishing written reasons – does it strike the right balance between speed & legal certainty?
Published 29 March 2019 By: Wouter Janssens
On March 8, the first ever User Conference of the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (BAT) was hosted in Munich, Germany. Wouter Janssens, founding partner at international boutique sports law firm CRESTA, participated in a round table discussion to tackle several topics from over a decade of BAT practice.
One of the key subjects discussed was the BAT’s policy on publishing written reasons when issuing awards. It’s an important matter to consider as written reasons can help to explain the Arbitrator’s thinking, allowing legal practitioners to analyse awards, deduce the general legal principles applied by the Arbitrator, and comprehend the decision in the context of underlying jurisprudence. On the other hand, written reasons imply higher arbitration costs (on average € 3,930 - three thousand, nine hundred and thirty Euros - for awards without, versus € 8,963 for awards with written reasons) and an extended duration of the proceedings1.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Arbitration | Basketball | Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (BAT) | BAT Rules | Dispute Resolution | Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland | Regulation | Swiss Private International Law Act (PILA)
- Litigation privilege hammered? Key points for sports organisations on the scope of litigation privilege from the West Ham Stadium case
- A cautionary tale for arbitrators in sports law disputes – lessons from Fleetwood Wanderers v AFC Fylde
- Current developments in the Chinese sports law market 2018/19
Founding Partner, CRESTA
Wouter is a founding partner at CRESTA, international boutique sports law firm based in Brussels (www.crestafirm.com).
Sports lawyer representing players, agents, clubs, leagues and investors on contractual, contentious (FIFA, FIBA, FIVB, CAS, BCAS) and regulatory matters.
Attorney-at-law at the Brussels Bar and Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Leuven.