The Jess Varnish decision - why British athletes are still not considered “employees” and what it means for athletes and NGBs
On 16 January 2019, Jessica Varnish, the 28-year-old former Great Britain track cyclist and European team sprint champion, lost an employment claim against British Cycling and UK Sport (judgement available here1). In the case, the Manchester Employment Tribunal (the Tribunal) ruled that Varnish was neither an employee nor a worker of British Cycling or UK Sport. This decision effectively restates rather than changes the current law, but it nevertheless has ramifications for all elite athletes and sports national governing bodies (NGBs) in England and Wales.
This article provides an overview of the key legal aspects of the judgment before considering the implications of the decision and highlighting some issues it raises for NGBs when drafting elite athlete agreements.
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Athlete Welfare | British Cycling | Cycling | Dispute Resolution | Employment | Employment Rights Act 1996 | Employment Tribunal | Equality Act 2010 | Governance | Regulation | Sport England | Sports | UK Sport | United Kingdom (UK)
- How technology is improving the fan experience – and creating legal challenges for clubs and leagues
- How can we better help athletes to prepare for the “after-life”?
- The football transfer that wasn’t to be – the unfortunate case of Mauricio Pinilla and the importance of having sports-specific legal solutions
About the Author
Rob is an associate in the Employment team at Farrer & Co and a member of the firm’s Sports Group.
Trainee Solicitor, Farrer & Co
Chloe is a trainee solicitor at Farrer & Co who is currently sitting in the Employment team. Chloe worked in factual television before deciding to train as a lawyer.