Why Publicly Criticising Match Officials Has To Stop - The Rassie Erasmus Lions Saga

Rugby Player
Tuesday, 15 March 2022 By Kevin Carpenter

The headline fixture of the opening round of the 2022 Six Nations championship Scotland v. England featured two of the match officials who refereed test matches during last summer’s three-match series between the world champions South Africa (aka. the Springboks) and the British and Irish Lions (B&I Lions/the Lions): Nic Berry from Australia who refereed the first test and Ben O’Keefe from New Zealand who had the whistle for the second test (with each of them being an assistant for the other in each game). It was a series overshadowed by issues regarding the officiating, in particular the performance of Mr. Berry in the First Test, not because of his actual performance during the match but because of the public way in which it was dissected by the South Africa Director of Rugby (and 2019 World Cup winning coach), Rassie Erasmus.

Three days after the First Test, which South Africa lost, an hour-long video appeared on the online platform Vimeo (since taken down – but at the time of writing available to view here). The video was posted by Mr. Erasmus, giving a wide-ranging critique of the performance of Mr. Berry and the decisions which he felt went against his team.1 Such a remarkable critique has never been made public before in the sport of rugby union and there was considerable consternation from the global Rugby community.2

This article summarises the case and draws out the prevalent legal issues arising from the Decision of the World Rugby Judicial Committee.3. With particular focus on the growing trend of criticism of match officials in rugby union (and sports more broadly) given the author has been a qualified and active referee, first in football (soccer) and then rugby union, for almost 15 years. Specifically, it provides:

  • A summary of the case and findings

  • Analysis of the evidence

  • Notable legal issues; and

  • Impact and takeaways for Rugby Union and other sports.

The numbers in square brackets are references to paragraph numbers from the Decision. A timeline of key events can be found in the Addendum.

To continue reading or watching login or register here

Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Related Articles

Written by

Kevin Carpenter

Kevin Carpenter

Kevin is a advisor and member of the editorial board for LawInSport, having previously acted as editor. In his day-to-day work he has two roles: as the Principal for his own consultancy business Captivate Legal & Sports Solutions, and Special Counsel for Sports Integrity at leading global sports technology and data company Genius Sports.

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.


Legal Advisors

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2022. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.