FIFA’s proposed solidarity mechanism reforms – an effective solution or a lost opportunity?
Published 16 January 2019 By: Toni Roca
On 25 September 2018, FIFA announced that football stakeholders had endorsed a long-desired “landmark reform of the transfer system.” 1 The reform package, which was formally endorsed by the FIFA Council a month later,2 includes a number of different proposals,3 chief among which are reforms to the solidarity payments mechanism.4 In the words of FIFA President, Gianni Infantino, a key objective is to “reinforce solidarity mechanisms for training clubs” and to achieve “the effective enforcement of rules that will deliver millions in solidarity payments to clubs”5. To try to accomplish this, the two specific reforms proposed are:
The creation of a “clearing house” to centralize payments associated with transfers; and
The application of the solidarity contribution to domestic transfers with an “international dimension”.6
This article examines the two proposals in light of how the system currently operates. Specifically, it looks at:
The current problems with solidarity payments;
Whether a clearing house can be an effective solution;
How exactly the “international dimension” will apply; and
Proposals on how to improve the current system.
This article assumes a certain level of knowledge about both how the transfer system and solidarity payments currently work, and the new reforms that have been proposed. Readers not familiar with these topics are advised to first read this article on solidarity payments7 and this article on the new reforms8.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Court of Arbitrary for Sport (CAS) | Dispute Resolution | Employment | fifa | FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber (FIFA DRC) | FIFA Transfer Matching System | football | Regulation | Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players | Solidarity Payments | Training Compensation
- A guide to training compensation and solidarity payments in football
- Changing the game: Dissecting the landmark reforms endorsed by the FIFA Football Stakeholders Committee
- Your guide to FIFA's Transfer Matching System
Toni is a sports lawyer and partner at Corner Abogado, Palma de Mallorca (Spain). He advises clubs, agents, sportsmen and federations on matters including transfer and contracting of players, dispute resolution before national and international bodies (FIFA, CAS); sponsorship and image rights and disciplinary proceedings.
He is also Chief Executive Officer at Football Transfer Watch, Palma de Mallorca (Spain), who specialise in efficient player transfer monitoring and end-to-end claim management solutions for football clubs around the world.
- Degree in Law by the University of the Balearic Islands.
- Master in Sports Law.
- Master in Tax Law.
- Master in Labour Law.
- Member of the Madrid Bar Association
- Member of the Spanish Sports Law Association.
- Member of the Esports Bar Association.
- Professor of the LLM Master in International Sports Law at ISDE.
- Professor of the Master in Sports Management and Legal Skill with FC Barcelona.
- Member of different Disciplinary Committees in Olympic Federations.
Languages: Spanish, Catalan, English and German.