2021 Tennis Anti-Corruption Program - Important Changes To Courtsiding & Inside Information Rules
The International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) (previously called the Tennis Integrity Unit) is the anti-corruption body covering all of professional tennis. It is responsible for preventing, investigating and prosecuting corrupt behaviour primarily related to betting and match fixing. This year, significant amendments have been made to its Tennis Anti-Corruption Program (TACP) by its stakeholders. One reason for the changes stems from the findings in the 2018 Independent Review of Integrity in Tennis (the Lewis Report), which recommended making amendments to the provisions on inside information. Additionally, the TIU had to deal with an increasing number of courtsiding cases in 2020.
As the TACP is the backbone in the fight against competition manipulation in tennis, understanding the main changes is critical for tennis players, support personnel and the other persons who are subject to it (collectively referred to as “Covered Persons”). Any contraventions may lead to sanctions including permanent ineligibility from the game. This article therefore examines the main changes, focusing on the following offences:
- Providing inside information;
- Courtsiding; and
- Preventing reporting and preservation of evidence
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: ATP | Betting | Corruption | Gambling | Integrity | International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) | its Tennis Anti-Corruption Program | Macolin Convention | Match Manipulation | Tennis | Tennis Integrity Unit (TIU) | WTP
- “Courtsiding” in sport: cheating, sharp practice or merely irritating?
- Why ‘national platforms’ are the cornerstone in the fight against match-fixing in sport: the Macolin Convention
- Regulating Against Competition Manipulation In Sport
- Betting On Inside Information In Football: Lessons from the Trippier and Sturridge cases