CAS rules on retrospective application of solidarity regulations (Cagliari v Club A)
With the very recent award CAS 2021/A/8238, issued on 8 September 2022 (CAS Decision), the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) appears to have finally resolved a jurisprudential contrast on the matter of FIFA solidarity mechanisms.
The case involves a loan agreement which turned into a permanent transfer upon occurrence of certain conditions. These conditions were fulfilled before the changes to the solidarity mechanism came about in 2020 where solidarity contribution was also made applicable to domestic transfers with an ‘international’ dimenson i.e. where the player had foreign training clubs; but the effect of the agreement came into after the amended solidarity contribution regulations came into force.
Therefore, the CAS Decision is relevant not only with specific reference to the issue of FIFA solidarity mechanism, but also in regard to non-retroactivity and legal certainty principles.
This article discusses:
The new regulatory framework for solidarity mechanism under FIFA Circular No. 1709
The decisions at the FIFA level
- The centrality of the moment when permanent registration occurred, to be considered as “disputed fact” pursuant to art. 26 FIFA 2020 RSTP
- Factual backgrounds and structure of the transfer agreement between SSC Napoli and Cagliari Calcio
- The centrality of the date of signing of transfer agreement and the fulfillment of the conditions precedent prior to the entry into force of the FIFA 2020 RSTP
Which edition of the FIFA RSTP is applicable? CAS intervention and contrast resolution
Please note that the decision has not been published by CAS as on the date of publishing this article.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Dispute Resolution | FIFA | FIFA RSTP | Football | Italy | Regulation & Governance | Sport
- FIFA’s Solidarity Mechanism And Problems Arising On Exchange Of Players (The Ante Rebic Case)
- Player Loans Turned Transfers: How Changes To FIFA RSTP Impacted Solidarity Payments
- Can Clubs Shift The Financial Burden Of FIFA’s Solidarity Contribution For Player Transfers
- A guide to solidarity payments in football under the FIFA Regulations
Paolo advises professional and amateur sports clubs, as well as athletes, sports agents and coaches on Italian and international football transfers and disciplinary proceedings, as well as on sponsorship and image rights agreements. He is a lecturer and a moderator in several course and Masters in Italy and abroad. He collaborates with the University of Milan (Course of Sports Law) and he’s author of national and international publications on sports law.
Alberto practices in Milan where he advises on commercial law, corporate law (extraordinary transactions) and sports law, both at national and international levels. Due to his substantial experience in the sports and media industry, professional clubs, agents and athletes rely on him for legal advice on audio-visual rights, players transfers, image rights, mandate agreements, relations with Associations and Leagues, and contract law matters in general.