• Home
  • Topics
  • Cycling, doping & the importance of due process: A review of the Karl Murray case

Cycling, doping & the importance of due process: A review of the Karl Murray case

Cycling, doping & the importance of due process: A review of the Karl Murray case
Monday, 20 November 2017 By Ani Ghazikhanian

In a decision1 dated 13 October 2017, a Panel from Sports Tribunal of New Zealand found cyclist Karl Murray liable for committing an anti-doping rule violation. Murray was competing in the Tour of Northland when he tested positive for Clenbuterol2 in a sample provided on 18 March 2017.

This article reviews the Tribunal’s decision, looking specifically at:

  • The facts of the case;

  • The relevant regulations, namely the Board of Drug Free Sport New Zealand Sports Anti-Doping Rules (2017);3

  • The Court’s reasoning and decision;

  • Why the sanction has been postponed.

Continue reading this article...

Register with your email and password
Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Related Articles

About the Author

Ani Ghazikhanian

Ani Ghazikhanian

Ani Ghazikhanian is a staff attorney at Jones Day and guides clients in the resolution of commercial disputes in business and tort litigation. She currently works on the representation of Experian, one of the three national consumer credit reporting agencies, in individual consumer credit litigation brought under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Prior to joining Jones Day in 2019, Ani served as a legal intern with the Minnesota Vikings Football organization as well as with LawInSport, a leading online international sports law publication.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Courses

Legal Advisors

Upcoming Events

There are no up-coming events

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2021. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.