FIFA’s fight against doping: WADA Code Compliance and an analysis of testing statistics
FIFA’s refusal to follow WADA in strictly imposing a two-year ban for serious doping violations, instead continuing their practice of determining sanctions on a case-by-case basis, led WADA to accuse FIFA of noncompliance with the Code in 2005.2 In 2006, in accordance with an advisory opinion issued by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, FIFA amended its regulations to conform to the Code, imposing a minimum two-year ban from competition for first-time doping offences.3 FIFA also signed the revised version of the Code in 2009.4
FIFA’s regulations require compliance with anti-doping from all member associations internationally, and it carries out its own drug-testing in international completion.5 Additionally, FIFA, like WADA, has the ability to “police” decisions taken at a domestic level, meaning that if an association or federation applies too light a sanction, FIFA may appeal the decision to CAS. FIFA also has the power to take any ban given at the domestic level and widen it to have worldwide effect, so that a player may not look to compete abroad to avoid a ban.6
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: 2014 FIFA World Cup Brazil | Anti-Doping | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | FIFA | Football | Governance | Olympic | Regulation | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) | World Anti-Doping Code (WADC)
- WADA claims links between doping and match-fixing; Singapore extends detention of match-fixing accused
- A player friendly approach to anti-doping violations - the “Kolasa” case
- WADA signs a global collaboration agreement with Pfizer Inc.
- How Science and Investigations combined can protect the rights of the clean athlete
Howard Jacobs is lawyer in the Los Angeles suburb of Westlake Village, California. Mr. Jacobs has been identified by various newspapers as one of the leading sports lawyers in the United States, and was profiled by USA Today in a feature article titled “Athletes accused of cheating find perfect advocate.”
Katy Freeman is a second-year law student, attending USC Gould School of Law. She is a former USA Swimming National Team member and NCAA All-American for UC Santa Barbara. She is particularly interested in the study of sports law and plans to practice in the field after graduating.