Parting with powerful executives: Lessons for sports organisations from the IFAF v Tommy Wiking case
Published 16 May 2018 By: Paul Nicholls QC
This article reviews the decision of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (the CAS) in International Federation of American Football (IFAF) and others v Tommy Wiking1.
The case is a salutary lesson in the difficulties that can arise when senior individuals within sporting bodies fall out with the organisation, which then wants to part with that individual. It is also an example of how it may be possible for a sporting organisation to exploit circumstances to achieve its preferred outcome.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: American Football | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Dispute Resolution | Employment Law | International Federation of American Football (IFAF)
- Bullying & harassment in sport: How the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 helps protect athletes & employees
- An introduction to Major League Baseball’s salary arbitration process
- Sport’s human rights requirements: an opportunity and challenge for sports lawyers as well as sports governing bodies
Paul Nicholls QC is a barrister at Matrix Chambers and specialises in a number of areas including restraint of trade and unlawful competition, employment law, commercial law, procurement law and public law.