The importance of trade marks in football – controlling brand value & avoiding own goals
Published 09 May 2016 By: Sean Corbett
This article examines recent cases, developments and disputes that illustrate the importance of trade marks within football and the vital role that the law plays in facilitating the commercial growth and success of the game. It also considers the pitfalls facing participants who take their eye off the ball when it comes to protecting the brands (names, badges, slogans, likeness) that they seek to commercialise. Specifically it looks at:
- The commercial explosion and the evolution of the Chinese Super League;
- The importance of the trade mark;
- Failure to own or register any trade marks – the case of Steaua Bucharest;
- The “Old Lady” with a fresh new look – the case of Juventus FC;
- Difficulties registering similar marks – the case of Valencia CF and DC Comics;
- Trade mark similarity - not close and certainly no cigar. The case of AC Milan and Marriott Hotels;
- Failure to register a domain name – FC Barcelona and FCB.Email, contrasted against PremierLeague.Club;
- FC Barcelona’s attempts to register the outline 7-pointed shape of its crest;
- Use of intellectual property rights as security – The Rangers and Sports Direct affair;
- Rangers vs Scotland’s Heraldic Law;
- A “trade mark free kick” - marks capable of identifying a footballer
- Owning the action on the pitch?
- The Special One v The Normal One – Jurgen Klopp
- 1-0 to the Arsenal! Protection against sale of unofficial merchandise
- A piece of the Killie pie – Killmarnock FC and Brownings Bakers and Wayne Shaw’s Piegate
- The 2016 UEFA European Championship v Ambush Marketing
- Comment: looking forward
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Euro 2016 | Europe | European Court of Justice | European Union | FIFA | FIFA Laws of the Game | Football | ICANN | Intellectual Property | Regulations of the UEFA European Football Championship | Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL) | Trade Mark | UEFA
- Is the ECB v Fanatix decision a fair deal for copyright owners?
- Free speech vs. athletes’ right of publicity: The Supreme Court’s Madden NFL decision
- What Twitter's deal with the NFL means for the future of sports media rights
- Do sports clip sharing apps breach copyright law? A review of the “Fanatix” case
Sean is an IP practitioner and trade mark attorney with a unique insight into, and focus on, brand protection issues. After 14 action-fueled years at Formula One Management Ltd where he was Brand Protection Manager Sean has set up on his own as a Brand Protection Consultant offering a unique one-stop resource for every conceivable brand protection challenge to help protect, develop and strengthen the IP rights that are crucial to commercial success.