The role of Information Sharing Agreements in tackling corruption and doping in sport
Information Sharing Agreements have recently been making the news, with the Austrian Play Fair Code and Sportradar and UEFA and ESSA joining forces,1 and the news on Wednesday 30 May 2018 that the Council of Europe and UEFA have signed a Memorandum of Understanding.2
Accordingly, this article examines what Information Sharing Agreements are, specifically looking at:
how they work;
the impact of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR);
who uses them in UK sport,
recent developments; and
a conclusion as to their effectiveness.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Anti-Corruption | Anti-Doping | Gambling Act 2005 | General Data Protection Regulation | Information Sharing Agreements | Integrity | International Standard | Macolin Convention | Protection of Privacy and Personal Information | Sports Betting Intelligence Unit (SBIU) | UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) | United Kingdom (UK) | WADA Code | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
- INTERPOL Integrity in Sport Bi-Weekly Bulletin - 20 March - 3 April 2018
- Why sport needs a unified approach to sanctions for corruption offences
- From corruption & scandal to reform: How the Brazilian Olympic Committee overhauled its governance model
Danielle is an Associate in the Sports Team at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP. Previously she spent eight years as legal advisor to the British Horseracing Authority (BHA) where her focus was on regulatory, governance, data protection and disciplinary matters. Danielle prosecuted a number of British horseracing’s high profile corruption and doping cases during her time with the BHA.
Hannah is an Associate in the Commercial Dispute Resolution team at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP where she specialises in sport, media and general commercial disputes, and has completed a secondment to The FA. She acts for a range of clients, including individuals, large corporates and national governing bodies, and has advised clients involved in a number of different sports.