The Tom Arscott Case - players' duties of confidentiality & the RFU's rules on leaking "inside information"

Rugby players getting ready to play
Published: Wednesday, 15 March 2017. Written by Phil Bonner No Comments

Confidential leaks and allegations of espionage have abounded in recent months in both sporting and political contexts. We’ve witnessed the furore surrounding alleged hacking relating to the US presidential election,[1] the shadowy Fancy Bears gaining access to the databases[2] of both the World Anti-Doping Agency and the United States Anti-Doping Agency, and even cases of cyber-espionage in Major League Baseball.[3] And now, allegations of espionage or, at the very least, “loose lips”, have arisen in the context of Rugby Union.

This article examines the Tom Arscott case and the issues arising out of it. Whilst Sale Sharks’ sacking of Tom Arscott[4] for allegedly leaking information to his elder brother Luke does not, admittedly, have the same geo-political ramifications as the incidents above, it does shine a spotlight on a number of issues.

The first half of the article looks at the obligations of confidentiality that an employee owes to his employer, the categories of “business information” that commonly arise, and the measures that employers can take to protect information provided to employees during the course of their employment. Specifically: 

  • A summary of events leading to the sacking of Arscott;

  • Players (employees) duties of confidentiality towards their team (employer);

  • Enforcement rights of an employer;

The second half the moves on to examine the RFU’s investigation into the incident, looking at:

  • The RFU’s key findings;

  • The duties of connected persons to report suspicious incidents;

  • Why did Sale Sharks make a complaint to the RFU under Regulation 17 (which sets out the RFU’s rules on anti-corruption and betting)?

  • What does the RFU’s decision reveal about the scope of Regulation 17?

Continue reading this article...

Register with your email and password
Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Related Articles

About the Author

Phil Bonner

Phil Bonner

Phil Bonner is an associate at Centrefield LLP, a sports and media law boutique based in Manchester, England.

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2020. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.

->