ASADA media statement - Federal Court judgment


Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) welcomes today’s judgment delivered by Justices Susan Kenny, Tony Besanko and Richard White in the Federal Court appeal by Essendon coach, James Hird.

Today’s unanimous judgment by the Full Court upholds Justice John Middleton’s earlier comprehensive ruling that ASADA lawfully conducted its doping investigation into the Essendon Football Club.

The judgment reaffirms ASADA’s strong view that ASADA and sports have a joint responsibility in upholding clean competition in Australia. 

ASADA and sports must partner if we are to have any chance in protecting the integrity of fair competition. This partnership allows ASADA, in harmony with sports, to run a holistic anti-doping programme focused on prevention, education, testing, investigation and enforcement.

ASADA Chief Executive Officer, Ben McDevitt said it is important that the community understands that the fight against doping, is not a fight against sport.

"We remain vigilant in our work to protect the health of athletes and their right to compete against clean athletes," said Mr McDevitt.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2020. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.