Why the BCCI refuses to come under the jurisdiction of India’s National Anti-Doping Agency
This article analyses the reason why the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is refusing to come under the ambit of the National Anti-Doping Agency of India (NADA). In doing so, it considers the peculiar position that the BCCI occupies as the apex body of cricket in India, and the implications of their decision. Specifically, its examines:
-
The background to the situation
-
The BCCI’s arguments for why it is not governed by NADA
-
The particular issues over the whereabouts requirements
-
Potential sanctions for non-compliance
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Anti-Doping | Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) | Cricket | India | International Cricket Council (ICC) | National Anti-Doping Agency of India (NADA) | WADA Code | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
Related Articles
- Contaminated sports supplements: lessons on product comparison and route of ingestion from the Joanna Blair case
- Is it time to create a fund to help athletes who have suffered an economic loss due to doping in sport?
- French law brought into line with the World Anti-Doping Code
Written by
Aahna Mehrotra
Ms. Aahna Mehrotra is the Founder of AM Sports Law & Management Co. She was called to the Bar in May, 2011 and has gained considerable exposure through her experiences at different institutions worldwide. After completing her schooling from Mayo College Girls’ School, Aahna studied law at the ILS Law College, Pune. She then worked for a year, in India, before pursuing her Masters in Entertainment & Sports Law from the UCLA School of Law. During her year at UCLA, Aahna worked in the Intellectual Property & Anti-Piracy department at Warner Bros., which helped in polishing her skills in the American system. She further enhanced her skills by pursuing a certificate course in Sports Law held at the University of Cambridge and a second Master’s degree in Sports Law from ISDE, Madrid. She also has a certificate in Sports Law from the Sports Law and Policy Centre, in Ravello; a certificate in Intellectual Property laws from the London School of Economics; a certificate in Entertainment Law from the University of New Hampshire; and has attended a certificate course in Sports Law at the University of Geneva, which was held in collaboration with Duke University, U.S.A.
