Funding, independence and effectiveness: Key points from the Government’s Tailored Review of UK Anti-Doping
In January of this year the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) published a document entitledTailored Review of UK Anti-Doping1 (UKAD) with a view to looking at the current state of the UK’s national anti-doping organisation and how it should plan for the future.
This article aims to look at some of the more interesting points that arise from that review. It does not aim to consider every point raised in the report, but rather looks specifically at:
Partnerships and intelligence sources
Education and prevention
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Anti-Doping | Culture | Department for Digital | Media and Sport (DCMS) | National UK Anti-Doping Policy | Tailored Review of UKAD | UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) | UK Government | United Kingdom (UK)
- The role of Information Sharing Agreements in tackling corruption and doping in sport
- Anti-Doping Leaders call for no compromise on Russia roadmap and the elimination of conflicts of interest in sport
- Why ‘national platforms’ are the cornerstone in the fight against match-fixing in sport: the Macolin Convention
- Qatar 2022 World Cup - laws, changes and legacy benefits
Philip is a barrister at St Johns Buidlings. He has a busy sports law practice covering all areas of sports disciplinary work including on field infractions, behaviour off the field of play which brings the sport into disrepute and anti-doping cases.
He has successfully represented the Amateur Swimming Association in ASA v G, a matter involving a match official being abused by a coach. He is currently instructed by the ASA in several cases including an appeal regarding a brutality charge.