11 crucial concepts about U.S. immigration for international athletes
Published 27 February 2020 By: Christine Swenson
This article was first published on 24 February 2015, and last updated on 27 February 2020.
How U.S. immigration laws might apply to international athletes is a notoriously tricky issue. While each application has to be individually assessed on its merits, this author would like to identify and explain 11 crucial concepts that you need to know when considering the issues of an international athlete working or travelling to compete in the U.S.
1. Immigration visas are an alphabet soup
Professional athletes can potentially obtain one of four different types of visas: B-1 (or the visa waiver program (VWP), depending on the athlete’s country of origin), P-1, O-1A, and O-1B. Diverse factors can influence which visa might be appropriate. Some relevant questions to answer are: will the foreign athlete participate individually or play as part of the team? Will the athlete actually play, or will he or she likely sit on the sidelines? Will they play at an elite level or more amateur level? Does the foreign national have a documented record of competing at home, abroad, and here in the United States? Is the athlete or his or her team internationally ranked? Finally, will the athlete be working in any other capacity or just playing for prize money from a tournament or competition?
If the athlete will not be employed in the United States – i.e. he or she is only competing to win prize money -- then a B-1 visa, or the VWP for participating countries, may be appropriate. When the athlete is “internationally recognized,” the P-1 classification may make the most sense. The O-1 visa category, meanwhile, is reserved for individuals with “extraordinary ability” -- that is for athletes who have reached the pinnacle of their careers.
2. O and P visa categories can overlap and cause confusion
The word “extraordinary” is pivotal when it comes to O visas. As an O-1A beneficiary athletes must demonstrate extraordinary ability that’s led to sustained national or international acclaim. As an athlete, you need to be “recognized in the field through extensive documentation.” Specifically, you need “a level of expertise indicating that the person is one of the small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor.” 
In comparison, the P-1 is available to individual athletes as well as to athletic teams. The P-3 visa, meanwhile, can be used for coaches.
An O-2 visa applies to accompanying foreign nationals. For instance, a coach, a trainer, or a doctor who works very closely with a player may qualify for this category, assuming that he or she is coming to United States solely for the purpose of assisting the athlete. The person who seeks the O-2 must play an integral role in the athlete’s performance. Finally, the O-2 visa holder must maintain a permanent foreign residence that he or she does not plan to abandon.
An O-1B visa might be appropriate for certain athletes who can’t establish the O-1A or the P-1 visa criteria, for whatever reason. O-1B visas are reserved for “artists” (as opposed to O-1A visas, which are reserved for “athletes”), however some sports and athletic activities can be classified as artistic endeavors – for instance if the athlete is in his first year as a professional, or competes in a sport that lacks conventional awards or prizes. Or perhaps the athlete’s sport does not have an official international ranking scheme that would allow him or her to qualify for a P-1 visa. P-1 visas are often appropriate for teams that compete – for instance, members of a high-ranking football club from Spain or England might apply for P-1 visas.
3. Athletes who also work in the U.S. as “artists” can have special tax obligations.
In October 2007, the IRS established a task force dedicated to “improving U.S. income reporting and tax payment compliance by foreign artists who work in the United States.” Four years ago, the IRS increased its enforcement and called upon venues and organizations to withhold 30 percent from a guest artist’s compensation (gross). When and how an athlete might qualify as a “nonresident” “guest artist” would take several pages to explain, but the bottom line is that athletes hired to do commercial work – such as starring in a Coke or McDonald’s commercial, singing at a charity event, or engaging in similar artistic activities – must be mindful of immigration-related tax consequences. If you are an agent or manager who represents such an artist, you may be liable for withholding 30 percent for taxes from the income that the foreign artist earns in the United States and, if you don’t, you could be liable for the amount that the IRS wanted you to withhold. The withholding doesn’t just apply to the artist’s gross income but also to other types of compensation, such as fees and reimbursements.
4. Deportability and Inadmissibility: world-famous athletes are not immune
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) defines the concepts of “deportability” and “inadmissibility” in great detail. In essence though, “deportability” means the U.S. government has reason(s) to kick you out, and “inadmissibility” means the U.S. government has reason(s) to keep you out. Deportation (or removal as it is officially called) is triggered by serious incidents and affects all but U.S. citizens, meaning even if an athlete has received a visa, the U.S. government can kick you out. Most relevant to athletes in O or P status are the circumstances where they may find themselves “inadmissible”, examples being:
- Engagement in notorious public behavior. This behavior does not necessarily need to be illegal, nor does it have to occur in the U.S. There doesn’t need to be a criminal charge filed for inadmissibility or deportability to arise. “Immoral” or drug-related behavior or even false or wildly inaccurate and misleading reports in the press can render an athlete inadmissible. That may not be fair, but athletes, agents, and team management need to be aware of and watchful for those potential issues.
- Engagement in an act that violates state or federal law. For instance, maybe the athlete experimented with performance enhancing drugs that are illegal in U.S., committed a violent act at a bar, failed to obey financial laws like paying taxes, or tried drugs that may be legal in one state (or your client’s home country) but is still banned under U.S. federal law. For this last, the perfect example is marijuana: while many individual states in the U.S. have legalized recreational marijuana use, it is still a Class I controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act, which means Schedule I drugs have a “high potential for abuse and the potential to create severe psychological and/or physical dependence.” Even if the athlete only admits to it during a media interview or a picture has been posted on social media of the athlete possessing or using, this wrongdoing can lead to the athlete being deported or declared inadmissible.
- Violation of U.S. immigration status rules, past or present. Mistakes happen and U.S. immigration law is rather unforgiving. For instance, maybe she overstayed her authorized stay on a previous visit to the U.S. to participate in one extra tournament. Maybe he engaged in unauthorized activity during a previous visit. Maybe her original flight was canceled or delayed causing her to remain one day past the exit date in her passport. Failure to abide by immigration regulations would give the government reason deny entry to the U.S., not to approve a visa application, or to revoke an issued visa and start deportation proceedings. It is not unheard of for someone to be escorted off his arriving flight to the U.S. and put right back on another flight back home.
If an athlete falls into one of the above categories, it does necessarily not mean they are barred forever from entering the U.S., but it can mean long delays to process a waiver of inadmissibility. Working with an experienced U.S. immigration attorney who can spot these issues early and develop a plan of attack in advance is critical. Even a DUI (driving under influence), which may not make the athlete inadmissible to the U.S. can still delay their visa issuance for several weeks while the government does background checks and medical tests, prior to visa approval.
5. The COMPETE Act’s lack of guidelines often creates problems.
The COMPETE Act of 2006 (the Act) is a very short law that broadened the definition of a P-1 visa athlete to include certain athletes and coaches who play in amateur or foreign leagues, provided they meet a variety of preconditions. The Act shifts qualified athletes away from the H-2B visa, which is created for one-time performances or seasonal workers, such as the winter ski industry. For example, it allows ice skaters, their teams’ coaches and trainers to procure P visas to come to the U.S. This sport doesn’t lend itself to the neat categorization of major league standings, which was previously the focus of the P-1 visa.
Athletes and sports franchises benefit from the Act because there is no cap for P-1 visas. Comparatively, not only is there a cap for the number of H-2B visas each year, there is often more demand than availability, and only 63 countries are allowed to participate in the H-2B visa program. No longer do teams have to sacrifice acquiring international talent based on the availability of the H-2B visa. The H-2B visa program has the added burden that team franchises to obtain a temporary labor certification from the U.S. Department of Labor, which requires franchises to demonstrate a lack of qualified U.S. workers among other requirements.
So, what’s the problem? The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) never created regulations that spelled out how individual athletes and coaches should be treated from an immigration perspective as a result of the Compete Act. The Act was meant to improve the competitiveness of American sports teams, yet because regulations have not been updated, the guiding memoranda add requirements and restrictions that undermine the Act’s purpose. This has created serious confusion. Critics have documented many instances of coaches and athletes who were unfairly denied their P-1 petitions because of this ambiguity in the Compete Act. For example, coaches are sometimes denied the P-1 visa because one reviewing official does not consider coaches “athletes” while another might. In U.S. immigration law, the use of memoranda to implement legislation is frequent and unavoidable. Until the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to addresses these inconsistencies, the COMPETE Act of 2006 will continue to be a hurdle international athletes have to overcome when looking to the U.S. for a career.
6. If the athlete is an international star, strongly consider a P-1A visa.
If the athlete has become “internationally recognized,” they may be able to obtain a P-1A visa to come to the U.S. to compete. The P-1 allows an athlete to visit the U.S. for a limited time to participate in an internationally recognized competitive athletic event. The event can be a competition (e.g. a basketball tournament) or a performance, but it must be a well-known event that’s recognized in multiple countries. To qualify, the athlete must be distinguished in a sport, and the employer in the U.S. has to file a form I-129 (“petition for non-immigrant worker”).
Importantly, the athlete’s support staff can also enter the country on P-1 visas, as long as they’re coming to support an athlete during a competition. Semantically speaking, a “competition” could be a single activity, or it could constitute a full season of play.
7. Documentation of international acclaim and dominance in a sport can make the visa process easier. 
For instance, to qualify for a P-1A visa, the athlete needs to produce documentation of at least two of the following pieces of evidence:
- The athlete has played in an international competition for their country’s team;
- He or she has played for a U.S. university or college in a major athletic competition or a U.S. sports league in previous years.
- The athlete or their team has been ranked, assuming that the athlete’s sport is big enough and respected enough and has an international ranking system.
- The athlete or the athlete’s team has won major honors in the sport.
- A respected expert in sports media or an official from the sport’s governing body has written a letter in support of the athlete or the athlete’s team is internationally recognized.
- A member of the sports media or other expert in the sport has written a letter in support that the athlete or the athlete’s team has won international recognition.
More can be better; it’s a delicate balance between quality versus quantity. The bottom line is to collect and collate this kind of documentation frequently paves the way for a smoother immigration process.
8. Coaches, support staff visas are dependent on the athlete’s visa category.
Coaches, and sports staff might apply under the P-1S visa, which defines eligibility for people who “perform support services which cannot be readily performed by a United States worker and which are essential to the successful performance of services.” P-1S visa holders tend to support P-1 athletes or teams. If an athlete obtains an O-1 visa, on the other hand, the coaches and trainers would need O-2 visas instead. One key distinction is that to qualify for the O-2, the support personnel has to have prior “critical skills and experience” with the O-1 athlete. Of course, there are visa options under both categories that apply to the performer’s family too.
9. Four criteria athletes must meet to qualify for a B-1 visa or Visa Waiver Program (VWP).
If the athlete wants to come to the United States to play in a promotional game or other type of limited athletic participation, they may be able to obtain a B-1 visa or use the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) provided that they meet several criteria. First off, the athlete and his or her sports team must be located principally outside the U.S. Secondly, the player and the team must earn their income principally outside of the U.S. Third, the team must be of international caliber and must play sports in an international league. Finally, athletes cannot receive a salary from a U.S. source, but they can receive prize money. It should be kept in mind that the athlete must be from one of the participating countries as a prerequisite for VWP eligibility.
10. Predicting when and how an athlete’s immigration status could unravel or cause problems is effectively impossible.
President Dwight Eisenhower famously once said, “plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.” By that, he meant life is unpredictable. You can never know when serendipities or negative surprises might come your way. The ability to “surf” these surprises – to react nimbly, effectively, and creatively to them – hinges on preparation. One’s preparation is reliant entirely upon the information known to those involved in the process, meaning that if an athlete hides or fails to disclose negative or questionable history, that will hinder the ability to be successful. I explain to my clients this way: “I need to know the good, the bad, and the ugly of your situation, even if I’m not asking exactly the right question. The last place I want to learn new or bad information is at your interview.” Understanding the complexities of U.S. immigration law (as it applies to an athlete’s specific circumstances) and forging relationships with experienced professionals, like immigration attorneys who work primarily with athletes, can hedge against problems and help international clients thrive and enjoy robust careers.
11. U.S. immigration law is slow to change
Merriam-Webster defines agility as the demonstration of “ease and grace in physical activity.” Yet agile is a word no one would use to describe the U.S. immigration system or its ability to adapt. Case in point: esports. Recently, LawInSport published “Battle Royale at the border: the immigration problems plaguing esports athletes in the UK and US” by Daniel Kozelko, which convincingly documents this. The current visas and the criteria for those visas do not work well for esports athletes. Remember: it literally takes an act of Congress to change the law. There is no indication Congress plans to create a new sports visa for esports athletes in particular, or to modern the criteria of current visas for all athletes. Keep this in mind when you analyze your options for sports visas and manage your frustration accordingly.
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Governance | Immigration | Regulation | United States of America (USA) | U_S_ Citizenship and Immigration Services
- R.I.P. TPO: a guide to FIFA’s ban on third party ownership
- What are the key legal issues facing an NFL London franchise? Part 2 – sporting visas, criminal convictions and EU law
- Delayed Entry: the FA’s “highest calibre” standard for non-EU footballers
- US immigration policy negatively impacts US Soccer
About the Author
Christine Swenson is the founder of Swenson Law Office, PC, which focuses exclusively on U.S. immigration law. Within that area, Christine concentrates on the unique immigration needs for the sports and entertainment industries and international investors.