Cross-code transfers in Rugby – Will the Denny Solomona case set a new precedent?
Published 13 January 2017 By: James Hill
Cross-code transfers have been a feature of the Rugby League / Rugby Union dichotomy for decades. However, Denny Solomona's recent controversial move of officially retiring from the Super League’s Castleford Tigers to sign a new contract with the English Premiership’s Sale Sharks sets a new precedent. Castleford have now commenced proceedings in the High Court against Solomona, his agent and Sale Sharks. The case could arguably affect cross-code transfers in the way that the Bosman ruling affected football back in the 1990s.
This article examines the key legal issues arising out of Solomona’s case, namely:
- The factual background;
- The prospect of success of Castleford's claims against Solomona for breach of contract;
- The prospects of success of Castleford's claims against Sale Sharks and Solomona's agent, Andrew Clarke, for inducing breach of contract; and
- The impact that the case may have on future cross code moves and any processes which may be put in place to prevent moves being forced through in a similar manner.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Australia | Australian Rules Football | Contract | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Employment | English Premiership Rugby | FIFA | Fiji | Football | National Football League (NFL) | RFL Operational Rules | RFL Standard Contact | Rugby | Rugby Football League (RFL) | Rugby Union | Super League | United Kingdom (UK) | United States of America (USA)
- Can you prevent cross-code player poaching in rugby?
- The legality of fixed-term employment contracts in European professional football – The Müller case and beyond
- How CAS deals with excessive contractual penalties in football
- When do playing contracts become binding? Hopoate v Parramatta Eels
James is an associate specialising in commercial litigation and regulatory matters in the sports sector - in particular football, rugby, cricket and cycling - advising governing bodies, clubs, athletes, agencies and brands. Prior to Onside Law, James trained and qualified at Fieldfisher in the Dispute Resolution department.
His practice encompasses High Court and County Court litigation, international and domestic arbitration, sports disciplinary proceedings and regulatory investigations. Regular work includes contractual disputes, sports disciplinary proceedings, governing body investigations, breaches of post-termination restrictive covenants, claims for inducing breach of contract, insolvency claims, defamation and intellectual property infringements.
He also has experience advising clients on commercial agreements, drafting rules and regulations for governing bodies, advising agents and players on representation contracts and advising clubs and agents on playing contracts and transfers.
Away from the office, James is a Millwall season ticket holder and keen cyclist since injury brought his rugby playing days to an end.