How BAT Ruled On A Player Contract Affected By Russia Ukraine War (Brantley v Basketball Club UNICS)
The Award is of note as it is one of the first decisions by an international sports arbitral tribunal regarding a professional player contract affected by the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. As such, the decision could serve as a reference for pending cases in the same context before the BAT, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and other sports arbitral tribunals.
The authors briefly describe the background of the case and summarize the decision of the Sole Arbitrator. In the subsequent analysis, the authors share their key-takeaways, which may be considered in similar cases in the future.
This article discusses:
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Basketball | Basketball Arbitration Tribunal (BAT) | Contract Law | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Dispute Resolution | Football | Force Majeure | Russia | Sports | Ukraine | United States of America (USA)
- How FIFA Tribunals Are Assessing Covid-19 Force Majeure Disputes (Hiddink v Maldives F.A.)
- Key Principles On Player Contracts From The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (Part 1 – Formation)
- Force Majeure: How The Obligation To Use ‘Reasonable Endeavours’ Affects The Sports Sector
- Key Principles On Player Contracts From The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (Part 2: Interpretation & Performance)
- Sport and Diplomacy in the aftermath of the Russia Ukraine war
- Summary Judgements & Force Majeure: How The Premier League Recovered $213mn From PPLive
- What obligations do clubs owe players if suspending their contract for Covid-19 (FCSB v Planic)?
- Key Principles On Player Contracts From The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (Part 3 – Compensation For Wrongful Termination)
Alexander Engelhard is a dispute resolution and commercial lawyer advocating before state courts and arbitral tribunals, especially in the sport, media and entertainment industry. He also acts as arbitrator and mediator. In addition, he advises clients on the drafting of contracts, rules and regulations.
He is a member of various arbitration and sports law-related organisations. He is also a lecturer at the University of Frankfurt for German and international arbitration, as well as on dispute resolution in national and international sport.
JUVE Handbook 2018/2019: highly recommended lawyer for dispute resolution.
Maike Herrlein is a trainee lawyer at Arnecke Sibeth Dabelstein working particularly on legal issues in sports. She holds a law degree from the University of Freiburg and a Master of Laws in sports law from the University of Bayreuth. During her Master's studies, Maike focused on competition law, data protection law and human rights issues in sports. In addition to her legal education, Maike holds a coaching license in swimming and has worked as a successful youth coach in the past.