Important lessons for athletes from the Nike / Federer “RF” logo dispute

Tennis Player with ball
Published: Wednesday, 08 August 2018 Written by Dan Parkes 5 Comments

While Roger Federer has triumphed on hard courts, clay courts and grass courts, he could now have a tough match-up against his former sponsor, Nike, as to who should retain the rights to his well-known "RF" logo, (the RF Logo):

rogerfederer

Indeed, the ongoing debate1 was the reason the eight-time Wimbledon champion's attire did not feature the RF Logo at this year's championship.

The issue arose following Federer's switch to a new sponsor2, UNIQLO, after ending his long-running sponsorship deal with Nike in March 2018. While Federer has been using the RF Logo since 2006 and was even involved in the design process himself, it was Nike who registered the RF Logo as trade mark and thus have ownership of it and, in principle at least, the corresponding right to stop third parties, including Uniqlo and Federer himself, from using it. Accordingly, in the absence of any clause to the contrary in his sponsorship agreement with Nike, Nike retained ownership of the iconic symbol when the deal ended.

This article examines the aspects of trade mark law that are relevant in the UK. It is worth pointing out that copyright will also exist in the RF Logo design and that, subject to any agreement to the contrary, that copyright will vest in person who designed it or that person's employer if it was created during the course of their employment. It seems likely that the RF Logo would have been designed by an employee of Nike and as such Nike will also own the copyright in the RF Logo.

Continue reading this article...

Register with your email and password
Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Related Articles

About the Author

Dan Parkes

Dan Parkes

Solicitor at Wedlake Bell LLP

Dan Parkes is a solicitor specialising in intellectual property and commercial matters at Wedlake Bell LLP. Dan provides advice to a broad range of clients in relation to the protection and exploitation of intellectual property rights, sponsorship, advertising, endorsement, agency and distribution arrangements and general commercial and consumer law issues.

Comments (5)

  • Josep F. Vandellos Alamilla

    • 08 August 2018 at 19:56
    • #

    Fantastic article!

    reply

  • Saad Khan

    • 16 August 2018 at 18:07
    • #

    Interesting article

    reply

  • Joseph Nyong

    • 17 August 2018 at 13:02
    • #

    This is revealing as well as educating.

    reply

  • Chikezie Umeike

    • 17 August 2018 at 21:02
    • #

    I love this article.

    reply

  • Rabia Ahmed

    • 03 September 2018 at 16:35
    • #

    Clarifies a lot! thanks for the article!

    reply

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Courses

Legal Advisors

Upcoming Events

There are no up-coming events

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2020. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.