Insuring student-athletes: what are the federal income tax implications of schools buying disability policies?
Over the past few years, more and more colleges and universities have been doling out tens of thousands of dollars to purchase disability insurance policies on behalf of individual star athletes. The schools are using money earmarked for student-athletes with special financial needs received from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) to pay for these policies. Many view this development as a windfall for those students on whose behalf the insurance policies are purchased. However, until now, an important issue regarding this process has remained unresolved: what are the federal income tax implications when a school pays the disability insurance policy premiums for a student-athlete? This article provides a first-of-its-kind analysis regarding those tax implications. Specifically, it looks at:
- The growing trend of schools purchasing ‘permanent total disability’ (PTD) insurance and ‘loss-of-value’ (LOV) insurance;
- The NCAA’s disability insurance programs for student-athletes;
- Who pays the policy premiums for PTD/LOV insurance coverage?
- What are the Federal income tax implications for athletes?
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: American Football | Athlete Welfare | Basketball | Hockey | Insurance | National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) | Tax | USA
- Paving the way to professionalism for college athletes - A review California’s Fair Pay for Play Act
- How player insurance works in Rugby Union and the modern challenges facing insurers
- Playing football is simply not cricket - issues with athletes’ insurance against training and warm-up injuries following the Rory Burns case
- NCAA agrees that student-athletes can receive funding for Olympic training
About the Author
Partner, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP (Los Angeles)
Richard Giller focuses his practice on recovering insurance benefits from reluctant insurance companies on behalf of his corporate and individual clients.
With more than 30 years of experience as an insurance recovery lawyer, Richard counsels for his clients in complex insurance and commercial matters and, when necessary, crafts litigation strategies to protect his clients. He has represented policyholders all over the country and successfully secured hundreds of millions of dollars in defense costs, settlements and indemnity payments on behalf of his clients. Richard is a strong advocate for policyholders in cases involving nearly every type of insurance coverage.
The leader of Pillsbury’s global Tax practice, James Chudy advises domestic and international clients on federal income tax aspects of mergers and acquisitions, spinoffs, bankruptcy reorganizations and business restructurings, corporate finance, securitizations, private equity investments and digital currencies. Based in New York, he also provides strategic counsel to emerging companies and individuals.