Skip to main content

The FA V Marc Bola – Dealing With Historical Aggravated Breaches

Friday, 25 March 2022 By Thomas Horton

An earlier article published on LawInSport by John Shea titled ‘New Precedent Set For Withholding/Editing Content From Regulatory Decisions? - The FA V Marc Bola’ considered a landmark decision addressing when it is permissible to edit the content of a FA Regulatory Commission’s written reasons.

This article looks at those underlying written reasons that were edited in the case of The FA v Marc Bola and the principles arising thereof.

To continue reading or watching login or register here

Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Related Articles

Written by

Thomas Horton

Thomas Horton

Thomas Horton is an associate (barrister) at Squire Patton Boggs (UK) LLP’s London office, practising in the firm’s sports litigation department. Thomas specialises in contentions and regulatory sports matters, regularly representing and advising football clubs, football players and football intermediaries. Thomas regularly appears before sports governing bodies’ disciplinary commissions. Thomas was ranked in the Legal 500, 2022 – London Bar – Sport as a ‘Rising Star’, and in November 2021 was appointed to Sport Resolutions’ Pro Bono Legal Advice Panel. Thomas regularly writes on sports law issues, particularly concerning football, and has provided analysis for various news providers, including the BBC, Sky Sports News and The Athletic.

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Upcoming Events