The legality of the anti-doping whereabouts rules: an analysis of the FNASS v. France human rights case
Published 14 March 2018 By: Natalie St Cyr Clarke
Whereabouts rules, requiring certain athletes to provide information about their location at a given time, 1 have been a source of contention in the sports community since their introduction in the 2003 World Anti-Doping Code2 (Code).3
Whereabouts rules were revised in the 2009 Code4 but nonetheless drew criticism from various quarters; high-profile athletes criticised the revisions,5 and UEFA and FIFA issued a statement rejecting individual whereabouts requirements.6 Also in 2009, a group of 65 Belgian athletes challenged whereabouts requirements on the basis of a breach of European Union privacy laws,7 and cited violations of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). 8 This challenge was ultimately unsuccessful in its attempt to rid the Belgian anti-doping regime of whereabouts rules.9
On 18 January 2018, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) issued their decision in Federation Nationale des Sydicats Sportifs (FNASS) and others v. France.10 It is the most recent case to consider the legality of whereabouts rules and illustrates their necessity in the fight against doping. This article reviews the decision.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Council of Europe | Council of Europe's Anti-Doping Convention | European Convention on Human Rights | European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) | Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) | Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) | WADA Code | Whereabouts Tests | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) | World Anti-Doping Code
- How whereabouts requirements operate in five different team sports
- eLearning and anti-doping - Tony Cunningham, WADA - Episode 63
- The key legal themes surrounding the Winter Olympic Games in Pyeongchang
- Why the Russian Olympic doping saga shows the need for a radically different approach to anti-doping in sport