• Home
  • Topics
  • Trinidad and Tobago Football Association v. FIFA – the validity of normalisation committees and exclusive jurisdiction of CAS

Trinidad and Tobago Football Association v. FIFA – the validity of normalisation committees and exclusive jurisdiction of CAS

Trinidad and Tobago Football Association v. FIFA – the validity of normalisation committees and exclusive jurisdiction of CAS
Friday, 23 October 2020 By Dr Despina Mavromati

On 13 October 2020, the High Court of Justice in Trinidad and Tobago (the High Court) issued their decision (available here[1]) on a claim filed by the Trinidad and Tobago Football Association (TTFA) against FIFA. They ruled, in essence, that the FIFA’s decision to remove the TTFA’s executive board from office and to appoint a normalization committee[2] to run its affairs was null and void as it was made in bad faith and “for an improper and illegal motive.”[3] The High Court’s decision stressed, among other things, that FIFA’s policy of pressure to try to “force” the TTFA to withdraw its case amounted to a contempt of court.” The High Court also analyzed, under its national law, the legality of Article 8(2) of the FIFA Statutes[4]. This provision, which allows FIFA to remove executive bodies of member associations under exceptional circumstances, was found illegal.[5]

However, this decision was eventually overturned by the Court of Appeal by a decision of 23 October 2020.[6] In this decision, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the filings of these proceedings were “ultra vires”, null and void and of no effect, confirming the exclusive jurisdiction of the CAS based on Article 66 of the TTFA Constitution and Article 69 FIFA Statutes. According to the statements of the former TTFA President to the press, the latter would respect the ruling and would not further challenge the judgment.[7] In a press statement issued on 24 October 2020, the TTFA President William Wallace and his vice-presidents confirmed their resignation following the legal defeat at the court of appeal.[8]

The proceedings spurred controversy in the relationship between FIFA and TTFA. Notably, following the TTFA claim before the High Court, FIFA granted the TTFA a deadline to withdraw its claim, or else face suspension from international competitions (which occurred in September 2020).

This article reviews the case, looking at the facts, the decisions and analyzing its potential repercussions for sports arbitration more generally.

Continue reading this article...

Register with your email and password
Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Written by

Despina Mavromati

Dr Despina Mavromati

Dr. Despina Mavromati is an attorney at the Swiss law firm BianchiSchwald and has extensive experience in international sports law and arbitration. She represents athletes, clubs and federations and advises on regulatory and sports governance matters, including the recognition and enforcement of awards and freezing of assets in Switzerland. Despina has acted as counsel, co-counsel, expert or arbitrator in numerous sports arbitrations, involving contractual, governance, doping-related and other disciplinary and ethics matters. Recognized as a Thought Leader by Who’s Who Legal in Switzerland every year since 2018, “Despina Mavromati is a “brilliant and accomplished” lawyer, renowned for having “built a great name and profile in the market””.

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Courses

Legal Advisors

Upcoming Events

There are no up-coming events

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2022. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.