• Home
  • Topics
  • Why the Scottish Premiership should amend its rules on bonus pool negotiation

Why the Scottish Premiership should amend its rules on bonus pool negotiation

Kilmarnoch_FC_and_SPFL_Logos
Monday, 05 January 2015 By David Winnie

This article considers the implications of the recent dispute at Scottish Premiership club, Kilmarnock FC (“Kilmarnock”), where the first team players (“Players”) are currently in dispute with the club’s management over the operation of its bonus scheme.

The dispute reflects a wider concern in the Scottish Professional Football League (“SPFL”) over the way clubs currently determine bonus pools, with the Scottish Players’ Union Chairman, John Rankin (midfielder at Dundee United), now calling1 for a modification to the current SPFL Rules2 pertaining to bonuses to help combat the problem.

Below, we will examine (i) the general nature of footballers’ bonuses and the related dispute at Kilmarnock; (ii) how bonus pools are currently treated under the SPFL Rules; (iii) the differing treatment of bonus pools under the Premier League and Football League’s respective rules, and (iv) reflect on whether the SPFL should amend the SPFL Rules to try to prevent the problems that can arise out of bonus pool disputes by looking south of the border to how their English counterparts regulate this area.

 

Footballers bonuses and Kilmarnock’s dispute

Kilmarnock discarded its traditional policy of paying the Players win bonuses on a game-by-game basis at the end of season 2012/13. A bonus pool was introduced in its place, the value of which is to be determined by the Club each season.

Media reports indicate that,at the end of the 2013/14 season, Kilmarnock Chairman, Michael Johnston, decided that the cash pool would be around £20,000, to be shared by the Players based on a number of factors, including final league position and the number of appearances made by each player.3 During 2013/14 season, Kilmarnock played 38 league games and 33 players were used over the period. As a consequence, many of the players received (on average) just a few hundred pounds each at the close of the season.

Before the start of the 2014/15 season, it is understood that Michael Johnston notified the Players that the first team bonus pot would remain unchanged. The Players refused to accept this and the Scottish Professional Players’ Association (the “SPFA”) had to be called in to mediate the dispute. Michael Johnston claims that the dispute has now been resolved, while the SPFA claims that it has not. In a further twist, the Players have considered the threat of strike action as the dispute continues to escalate.4

What is the likely position under the Players’ contracts?

We cannot know for certain what the Players’ contracts say but, in the author’s experience, contracts of employment of professional football players follow a standard form and the only variance is in the personal terms (such as: commencement date, the term of the employment contract, basic monthly/weekly wage, payment per appearance (in the first team), lump sum payments, holiday leave and medical cover).

The contract will usually include an annex or schedule in relation to payment of bonuses. Richard Berry has helpfully set out the various bonus structures used by clubs to incentivise players in English professional football and the same is generally true of clubs in Scottish football. In his article, Richard states that, Clubs will sometimes link appearances to other bonuses that may be awarded in recognition for contribution to the club’s on field achievements. For example, players might be rewarded for every point the team gains during matches in which the player participates, or for every win that the team achieves.5

Richard adds that, In the event that a team is promoted/wins the league/cups, it is common for an additional bonus pot to be shared amongst the playing squad, usually by further reference to appearances. Some clubs might award a fixed bonus to each player who has played in more than a set number of games depending on final league position. Others have more complicated arrangements in place”.6

Richard uses the example of how an English Championship club, which wins promotion to the Premier League divides the bonus pool between the players based on the number of games played. His article states that, A club in the English Championship which wins automatic promotion to the Premier League might award points to its players based on the number of games played during the regular 46 game season - with 3 points available for a starting appearance, 2 points for a playing substitute and 1 point for a non-playing substitute. Over the period of a season, a certain amount of points will therefore be available. It is then simple to divide the bonus pool equally to give a value per point and allocate it at the end of the season if the club is successful”.7

Continue reading this article...

Register with your email and password
Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Related Articles

About the Author

David Winnie

David Winnie

David is a solicitor and Head of the Sports Group at city law firm Ronald Fletcher Baker LLP. David advises on a wide range of sporting issues and has particular experience in the football industry. David is a former professional football player and has taken his passion for sport into the legal world.

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Courses

Legal Advisors

Upcoming Events

There are no up-coming events

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2021. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.