• Home
  • Topics
  • Sports
  • Is Australia’s “Anti-Siphon List” Still The Best Way To Protect Live Sports Broadcasts?

Is Australia’s “Anti-Siphon List” Still The Best Way To Protect Live Sports Broadcasts?

Australia v India Cricket Match
Friday, 17 September 2021 By Andrew Riordan, Sophie Timms

The launch of pay television during the 1990s in Australia created high levels of political concern that the general public of Australia would no longer be able to access major sporting events on free-to-air television. It was thought that the pay television operators would have greater resources to “siphon” events like the Australian Football League (AFL) Grand Final, the Melbourne Cup and the Olympics behind a paywall.

This concern led to the creation of an anti-siphoning list (The List), established under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) and aimed at ensuring specified sporting events remained accessible free of charge.

However, the evolution of the sports broadcasting landscape over the past 30 years has led to views that The List is no longer the most effective method of ensuring Australia has free access to major sporting events[1]. Of particular significance is:

  1. Following fragmentation of the broadcasting market, where viewers are no longer restricted to viewing sporting events on free-to-air networks, it would appear that the anti-siphoning list restricts competition with its original intended purpose now less relevant.
  2. It is for this reason that other measures should be implemented to ensure that Australians can access the level and variety of sports to meet consumer satisfaction, including societal benefits through greater exposure to women’s and para sport.
  3. Many sports fans have moved to pay television or streaming services due to the freedom of choice, increased content and the lack of advertising.

Continue reading this article...

Register with your email and password
Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Related Articles

About the Author

Sophie Timms

Sophie Timms

Sophie is a Lawyer in the Risk Advisory and Financial Restructuring and Insolvency teams at Norton Rose Fulbright, Melbourne. She completed her Juris Doctor (including a Graduate Certificate in Sport Law) in February 2020. Prior to joining Norton Rose Fulbright, she worked as a paralegal for the Solicitors Assisting on the Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informers.

Andrew Riordan

Andrew Riordan

Andrew Riordan is a dispute resolution lawyer based in Melbourne and is a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright Australia. He specialises in corporations law and competition and consumer law disputes and regulatory investigations.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Courses

Legal Advisors

Upcoming Events

There are no up-coming events

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2021. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.