Should cross code conduct be considered in mitigation in rugby disciplinary cases? The Sonny Bill Williams decision
Published 17 August 2017 By: Graham Gilbert
As the dust has now settled on the British & Irish Lions’ Tour of New Zealand – the trophy split, the combined team picture taken, the long flight home done – it seems as good a time as any to reflect on a point that was widely regarded as hugely significant in the series: the sending of All Black Centre Sonny Bill Williams in the second test. Much ink has already been spilt considering the ramifications of this on the pitch, both during the match and in the next, less on considering the judicial process around it.
The Judicial Committee met on the evening of the 2 July and concluded that Williams should be suspended for 4 weeks (the reasons for the decision were not published until the 26 July). However, it is open for discussion as to whether that could, or indeed should, have been longer.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Australia | British & Irish Lions | Disciplinary | Dispute Resolution | New Zealand | Rugby League | Rugby Union | Rugby Union Laws of the Game | World Rugby Regulations
- Why sport needs a unified approach to sanctions for corruption offences
- Sexism in football & the independence of disciplinary panels: Issues from the David Moyes case
- Key points from the Review of the BHA's Disciplinary Panel, Licensing Committee and Appeal Board
- The role of the UEFA Ethics and Disciplinary Inspector in disciplinary proceedings
Graham is a barrister at 3PB. Having gained a wealth of knowledge in other areas, Graham has most recently begun accepting instructions in sports law matters and has a keen interest in regulatory and disciplinary aspects of the area, both domestically and internationally. He regularly prosecutes in prohibited substance matters for the British Horseracing Authority, as well as assisting with other disciplinary matters on the Authority's behalf.