A short analysis of FIBA's decision to permit the use of headgear
- Background to FIBA's headgear controversy
- The decision to amend the no-headgear rule
- Reaction to FIBA’s decision
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Africa Champions Cup | Athlete Welfare | Basketball | Discrimination | Equality | Fédération Internationale de Basketball (FIBA) | FIBA U-16 Asian Championship | Governance | Regulation | Wheelchair Basketball Federation (IWBF)
- Why human rights law demands FIBA review its “no-turbans” decisions
- FIBA postpones decision on “no-headgear” regulation
- FIBA relaxes “no-headgear” rule for a two-year trial period
- How FIBA’s “no headgear rule” highlights the socio-cultural challenges of regulating a sport
Saurabh is a lawyer working as counsel for Star India Pvt. Ltd. He is also associated with the Football Players Association of India (FPAI). He received his B.A./LLB from The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata, and was a recipient of the Graduate Scholar Award at the Fifth International Conference on Sport and Society in July 2014. He has previously worked with organisations such as Adidas and Atletico de Kolkata, a franchise in the Hero Indian Super League.