Rethinking agents’ regulations: why clubs & players should take more responsibility
Last September, the FIFA’s Football Stakeholders Committee endorsed a series of important changes in relation to agents (a review of which is available here for background reading). Four of those key measures have been largely welcomed across the sector, namely:
- reintroduction of a mandatory licensing system for agents to raise professional standards, which will include further education measures and a requirement for continuing professional development;
- all agents’ commissions to be paid via the FIFA Clearing House, which is currently being developed;
- the reinstatement of an effective FIFA dispute resolution system to address disputes between agents, players and clubs; and
- the disclosure and publishing of all agent-related work in transfers, to increase transparency, improve the credibility of the transfer system and support the implementation of new regulations.
However, there are two measures that have raised a huge controversy in the industry:
- the limitation of multiple representation to avoid conflicts of interest and,
- above all, the establishment of a cap on agents’ commissions.
FIFA is currently developing these proposals to be turned into regulations that we can expect by the second half of this year 2020.
Agents’ (led by super agents Mino Raiola, Jorge Mendes and Jonathan Barnett, among others, and the other members of the Association for Football Agents and the European Football Agents Association (EFAA) have threatened FIFA with legal action over plans for a cap on transfer payments, in what appears to be a very interesting dispute. 
This article analyses the controversy and asks whether FIFA’s new approach is the right one. Specifically, it examines:
- Whether agents’ commissions are really that high
- How we ended up in this situation
- The role of FIFA’s regulations
- Amounts of commission
- Duel representation
- The conduct of the clubs
- The role of FIFA’s regulations
- The authors’ recommendations for improving agents’ regulation
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Agents | Commercial | Competition | Dispute Resolution | FIFA | Football | Regulations on Working with Intermediaries
- Changing the game: Dissecting the landmark reforms endorsed by the FIFA Football Stakeholders Committee
- FIFA’s proposed solidarity mechanism reforms – an effective solution or a lost opportunity?
- An overview of FIFA’s ‘Phase 2’ reforms – agents, loans and clearing house
- Would FIFA’s newly proposed agents’ regulations comply with German & EU law?
About the Author
Toni is a sports lawyer and partner at Corner Abogado, Palma de Mallorca (Spain). He advises clubs, agents, sportsmen and federations on matters including transfer and contracting of players, dispute resolution before national and international bodies (FIFA, CAS); sponsorship and image rights and disciplinary proceedings.
He is also Chief Executive Officer at Football Transfer Watch, Palma de Mallorca (Spain), who specialise in efficient player transfer monitoring and end-to-end claim management solutions for football clubs around the world.
- Degree in Law by the University of the Balearic Islands.
- Master in Sports Law.
- Master in Tax Law.
- Master in Labour Law.
- Member of the Madrid Bar Association
- Member of the Spanish Sports Law Association.
- Member of the Esports Bar Association.
- Professor of the LLM Master in International Sports Law at ISDE.
- Professor of the Master in Sports Management and Legal Skill with FC Barcelona.
- Member of different Disciplinary Committees in Olympic Federations.
Languages: Spanish, Catalan, English and German.