#Sport: The digital battle between sponsors, rights holders and ambush marketers
Published 13 July 2017 By: Dan Smith
Digital media has transformed marketing, with global online advertising revenues predicted to exceed US$260 billion by 2020. But the popularity of mobile, social media and digital media marketing generally has also opened up new fronts in the battle between rights-holders and ambush marketers. And, in social media in particular, some of the most memorable advertising over recent Olympics, World Cups and other major sporting events, has often seemed to originate from unofficial sources.
In response to these new threats, rights-holders have looked to take steps to preserve the value in their official sponsorship packages. The US Olympic Committee, in advance of Rio 2016, went so far as to warn non-sponsors, in correspondence, that they could not use #Rio2016 or #Team USA, share or retweet anything from official Olympic pages or reference any Olympic results. But it's questionable how effective such threats are, certainly when they appear to extend far beyond the legal recourse which is actually available.
So is it the case that official sponsors will, in practice, have to share the social media spotlight with their "unofficial" competitors? And will that have a knock-on effect on the value rights-holders are able to recoup from their official sponsorship packages? This article examines the contemporary battle lines between ambush marketers, rights holders and the law in the context of social media. Specifically, it looks at:
- How does the law combat ambush marketing in social media?
- The use of intellectual property rights
- Passing off, unfair competition, misleading advertising
- Specific legislation for major events
- Control over athletes
- The practical difficulties of prevention and enforcement
- Is the battle against ambush marketing in social media being lost? And what can rights holders do to regain the upper hand?
- The future of ambush marketing
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Ambush Marketing | Dispute Resolution | FIFA | FIFA World Cup | Football | Hash Tags | Intellectual Property | Olympic | Paralympic | Passing Off | Rule 40 | Social Media | Sponsorship | Super Bowl | United States Olympic Committee (USOC)
- How successful were FIFA and its sponsors at protecting their brands during the World Cup?
- Navigating Olympic advertising: Rule 40 – a global perspective
- What the social media revolution means for sports fans and rights holders
- Ambush marketing and the legal issues to consider at the RWC 2015 and Euro 2020
Dan is Director, Head of Advertising Law at Gowling WLG.
Dan has particular expertise in digital media, advising on social media campaigns, app development, contracts and rights management in the increasingly complex digital landscape and emerging issues such as those associated with native advertising, ad blocking, vlogging and live streaming via apps such as Periscope.