Rule 40 in France: limited new opportunities for partners & sponsors of French athletes
After Germany, Australia, the USA and Great Britain, France recently followed suit to relax its application of Rule 40 of the Olympic Charter. Thus, for the first time in the history of the Olympic Games, the members of the French Olympic team will be entitled to authorize their business partners to use their image during the Tokyo Olympic Games, postponed to 2021 due to the global health crisis.
This new rights result from the recent implementation by the French National Olympic Committee (CNOSF) of the new Rule 40 of the Olympic Charter, and more particularly of paragraph 3 of its implementing provisions, which came into force on 26 June 2019, stating:
"Competitors, team officials and other team personnel who participate in the Olympic Games may allow their person, name, picture or sports performances to be used for advertising purposes during the Olympic Games in accordance with the principles determined by the IOC Executive Board".
The CNOSF published its updated guidelines on the application of the new Rule 40 early this year. The new rules apply to competitors, coaches, instructors or officials who will participate in the Tokyo Olympic Games under the colours of France. This article reviews the main changes from prior years, looking specifically at:
- The limited possibilities for thanking non-Olympic sponsors;
- More flexible rules for Olympic sponsors;
- Do the new guidelines go far enough and how do they compare to other countries?
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Athletics | Commercial | Competition Law | France | Germany | Great Britain | Olympics | Rule 40 | Sponsorship | Tokyo 2021 | USA
- Navigating Olympic advertising: Rule 40 – a global perspective
- Are the British Olympic Association’s new Rule 40 Guidelines still too restrictive?
- How competition law is shaping Olympic sponsorship: Part 1 – the origins and evolution of Rule 40
- Rule 40 in the United States: new opportunities for sponsors but with strings attached
- How competition law is shaping Olympic sponsorship: Part 2 – Germany's Competition Authority helps ease restrictions on athletes
About the Author
Clément Monnet is a Counsel in Norton Rose Fullbright's Paris office and a member of the IP, Technology & Communications Group (IPT&C). His practice covers all intellectual property and new technologies areas including notably trademarks, patents, copyright, design and Internet issues, both contentious and non-contentious.
Clément also focuses his practice on Sport law. In this respect, he is notably the coordinator of the Paris Sports Group which is composed of more than 15 lawyers whore are all experts in their field and have knowledges of the sports industry.
His clients comprise sportsmen, clubs, event organizers, advertisers, sport marketing agencies and sport agents, in the following areas: image contract, partnership agreement, equipment supplier agreement, data protection, Ambush marketing, sport bets, lottery/gambling, Evin law, contractual litigation and trademark law.
From an academic point of view, Clément contributes to various studies for the “Dictionnaire Permanent Droit du Sport” in France.