A comparison of sports regulations on the use of wearable technology & data collection
The increasing usage of wearable technology in sport has raised many interesting regulatory and legal issues, as governing bodies and leagues scramble to adapt to the rapidly developing industry. Teams ideally want to collect as much biophysical data about their players as possible. However, players are becoming increasingly wary of allowing their personal information to be recorded and harvested, and are asking more questions about who owns the data and how it can be used (a tension reflected in the negotiations of collective bargaining agreements).
To help bring some clarity to the space, this LawInSport reference resource provides a general overview of how different sports organisations currently approach the regulation of wearable technology. Please note that, given that this is a rapidly evolving area, regulations may well change, evolve and/or be supplemented to over time. We will endeavour to keep this resource as up-to-date as possible; and please do contact us if you have any comments and/or additional information.
This article covers the regulations of the following organisations:
- Australian Football League (AFL)
- Aviva Rugby Premiership (England)
- British Horse Industry Confederation (equestrian, including dressage, jumping, and eventing)
- International Fencing Federation (FIE)
- Federation of International Basketball Federation (FIBA)
- Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)
- Federation Internationale de Gymnastique (FIG)
- Federation International Ski (FIS)
- Federation International de Snowboarding
- Federation Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB)
- Federation International de Volleyball - Volleyball (Indoor) (FIVB)
- International Cricket Council (ICC)
- International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF)
- International Olympic Committee (IOC)
- International Table Tennis Federation (ITTF)
- International Taekwon-do Federation (ITF)
- International Tennis Federation (ITF)
- International Triathlon Union
- National Basketball Association (NBA)
- National Football League (NFL)
- National Hockey League (NHL)
- Major League Basketball (MLB)
- Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI)
- United States Golf Association (USGA)
- World Archery
- World Badminton Federation (WBF)
- World Curling Federation
- World Karate Federation
- World Rowing Federation, Federation Internationale des Societes d'Aviron (FISA)
- World Rugby
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Athlete Welfare | Aviva Rugby Premiership | Collective Bargaining | Commercial Law | Contract Law | Employment Law | EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) | Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) | Intellectual Property | International Basketball Federation (FIBA) | International Cricket Council (ICC) | International Olympic Committee (IOC) | International Tennis Federation (ITF) | Labor Law | Major League Baseball (MLB) | National Basketball Association (NBA) | National Football League (NFL) | National Hockey League (NHL) | World Rugby
- Wearable tech in sport: the legal implications of data collection
- Sponsorship & data trends in sport: legal issues for sponsors & rights holders
- The legal implications for big data, sports analytics and player metrics under the GDPR
About the Author
Sean is the founder and CEO of LawInSport. Founded in 2010, LawInSport has become the "go to sports law website" for sports lawyers and sports executives across the world.
Ani Ghazikhanian is a third year law student at the University of Notre Dame Law School in the United States with a specific interest in sports law. She is interning with LawInSport and studying in London as part of the Notre Dame London Program for Fall 2017. Previous work experience includes interning with the NFL's Minnesota Vikings' in-house counsel.