The Blake Leeper Case - CAS Panel Rejects Double Amputee’s Appeal To Compete At The Olympics
A recent award handed down by the Court of Arbitration for Sport has found in favour of World Athletics in its dispute with the US Paralympian 400m sprinter, Blake Leeper, concerning the athlete’s eligibility to run against able-bodied athletes in World Athletics Series competitions as well as the upcoming Tokyo Olympics.
This article reviews the case, examining:
- Who is Blake Leeper?
- The Nature of the Dispute
- The CAS Verdict
- Burden of Proof
- Overall Competitive Advantage
- Differences to the Pistorius Award
- Moving Forward
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Arbitration | Athletics | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Dispute Resolution | Eligibility | Paralympics | Regulation | Tokyo Olympics | United States | World Athletics | World Athletics Technical Rules | World Para Athletics Rules
- The dark side of the Paralympics: cheating through “boosting”
- More than just sport: An inside look at the modern Paralympic classification system
- Sex on a spectrum in the binary world of sport: the CAS’s decision in the case of Caster Semenya & Ors v the IAAF
- Anti-doping - Examining contamination cases